🔒 RakshEx Launch Week — India's First AI Runtime Governance Platform →

RaksHex vs Snyk

Snyk is excellent for static code vulnerability scanning. RaksHex operates at the other end of the spectrum — scanning live API traffic at runtime, detecting LLM-specific threats like prompt injection, and providing cost intelligence Snyk simply does not cover.

FEATURESNYKRaksHex
Analysis ApproachStatic code analysis (SAST) — scans source filesRuntime API traffic analysis — scans live requests
OWASP API Top 10Partial — code patterns only, no runtime contextFull OWASP API Top 10 on live traffic
Prompt Injection DetectionNot available — LLM threats not in scope50+ payload patterns, real-time blocking
LLM Cost IntelligenceNot availablePer-model, per-agent cost attribution + forecasting
Shadow API DetectionNot availableRuntime undocumented endpoint discovery
Kill SwitchNot availableHard stop on budget, anomaly, or red-team score
PCI DSS v4.0.1 ComplianceCode-level vulnerability mapping onlyFull PCI DSS v4.0.1 runtime compliance reports
Agent-level Threat DetectionNot availableMCP tool governance, agent drift detection
API Collection ScanningScans code, not Postman/OpenAPI collections
Runtime PII RedactionNot availableReal-time redaction in live API traffic

When to choose Snyk

  • • You need static code scanning in CI/CD pipelines
  • • Your primary threat model is dependency vulnerabilities
  • • You do not have LLM agents in production
  • • Runtime API security is handled by another tool

When to choose RaksHex

  • • You need runtime API traffic scanning (not just SAST)
  • • You have LLM agents exposed to user input
  • • You need prompt injection and shadow API detection
  • • You want LLM cost attribution alongside security
  • • You need PCI DSS compliance from runtime evidence